Storm surge threatens nearly 450K N.J. homes with $134B in reconstruction costs, new study finds

Star-Ledger July 10, 2014

ortley-beach-toms-river-sandy.JPG
A new study released today found that nearly 450,000 properties in New Jersey are at risk of being damaged by hurricane-driven storm surge. Here, an aerial view of the Ortley Beach section of Toms River is pictured after Hurricane Sandy battered the community. (Andrew Mills/The Star-Ledger)
Nearly 450,000 homes in New Jersey stand at risk of damage from hurricane-fueled storm surge, a new report released today found, representing more than $134 billion in potential reconstruction costs.
Only Florida, Louisiana and New York have more exposed homes than New Jersey, according to the analysis from CoreLogic, a California-based analytic and research firm.
Despite damages caused by massive storms like Hurricane Sandy, Thomas Jeffery, senior hazard scientist for CoreLogic Spatial Solutions, said he expects people to continue to build in the nation’s coastal communities, putting more properties at risk.
“People build there because they really want to have that aesthetic quality,” he said. “People are willing to pay more for that. I don’t think you are going to see a big deterrent from Sandy.”
Though New Jersey has a less-expansive coastline than states such as Florida and Texas, it still ranks among the top five for its number of exposed homes. The report said that’s because New Jersey’s low elevation allows storm surge to push water further inland and impact more properties. The density of development along the coast is another contributing factor.
Sandy set record storm surges, causing tens of billions of dollars worth of damage. At Sandy Hook, the storm surge pushed the water level to more than 13 feet before the gauge stopped reporting. That broke a previous record of 10.1 feet.
Along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts, more than 6.5 million homes are vulnerable to storm surge, the report found. That represents $1.5 trillion in total potential reconstruction costs, the majority of which is concentrated in 15 major metropolitan areas.
The New York metro area, which includes northern New Jersey and Long Island, is most at risk for both the number of vulnerable homes and the costs associated with rebuilding those homes, followed by Miami.
Nearly 690,000 homes are at risk in the New York area, the report found, representing reconstruction costs of $251 billion.
Though this year’s hurricane season is expected to be slightly below normal, Jeffrey said, “the early arrival of Hurricane Arthur on July 3 is an important reminder that even a low-category hurricane or strong tropical storm can create powerful riptides, modest flooding and cause significant destruction of property.”
Because of changes CoreLogic made to its methodology , such as including other categories of single-family homes, the company said the data from this year’s report should not be compared with data from previous years.

Chester (Penna.) planners give thumbs down to Covanta land development plan

Delaware County Daily Times, July 9, 2014

[This story does not ask the obvious question, is New York’s trash about to come to the Camden, N.J. incinerator? –P.M.]
 

Trash-to-steam plant in Chester. (Times Staff / ERIC HARTLINE) 
CHESTER — The city planning commission voted Wednesday night not to recommend for approval an application from a trash incinerating company to construct a new building on its property. The city’s planning department approved the application, but after hearing testimony from a number of residents, as well the facility’s operator, the commission declined to endorse the project by a 5-0 vote.
Covanta’s Delaware Valley Resource Recovery facility, the largest energy-from-waste incinerator in the country, is located in the unit block of Highland Avenue and burns municipal solid waste in order to generate electricity, handling about 1.2 million tons of garbage per year. It generates 80 megawatts of electricity at peak performance. The company recently entered into a 20-year contract to bring waste from New York City via train to Wilmington, Del., where it will then be placed on trucks and driven to the Chester facility.
Covanta proposed constructing a 1,000-square-foot office building and 15,000-square-foot rail box transfer building to handle the new mode of delivery. Currently, all of Covanta’s waste is brought in on transfer trailers, but the proposal would enable trucks carrying the rail boxes to deliver some of the waste. The contract with New York City is to incinerate 1 million tons of garbage per year, but would not increase the permitted capacity of the facility, and truck traffic would not increase, according to Covanta Vice President John Waffenschmidt. He said that about 400,000 tons from New York would be brought to the Chester facility, and the rest would go to other Covanta locations.
“We receive all of our waste by truck,” Waffenschmidt said in response to some of the 100 people in attendance at the meeting questioning the application. “The request we have is to have some of that by rail. There is no request at all to increase the amount of waste.”
At least a dozen residents voiced their opposition to the land development request, with most saying that they have suffered health problems due to the facility’s emissions since it began operation in the early 1990s. Claims of asthma and birth defects were made and complaints about foul smells emanating from the facility were voiced.
Waffenschmidt said the emissions from the plant are regulated by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and the federal Environmental Protection Agency, and that Covanta complies with those regulations.
“There has been no request to change those limits,” he said.
Planning commission Chairman Anthony L. Moore said that since the proposal was first heard at a June meeting, he and other commission members have been inundated with correspondence from residents and environmental advocates.
“We’ve had public comment at our meeting last month,” Moore said. “We’ve gone to Covanta and asked some of the public’s questions. We’ve also met with an environmental group. We’ve heard your concerns. We’ve gotten 50 to 100 emails. Please know that all of the environmental concerns have been taken into account.”
Mike Ewall, of the Energy Justice Network, gave a condensed version of the hour-long presentation he made to the commission on Tuesday, saying that asthma rates in Chester were three times higher among children than in the rest of the state. He added that Covanta could be burning more trash than they are now.
“They are not burning at full capacity,” Ewall said, citing EPA reports. “They have extra space to burn more.”
He explained that the facility is only operating at 75 percent of its permitted capacity.
A chorus of residents in attendance said that they not only wanted the application denied, but that they wanted the commission to close the incinerator for good.
“The planning commission has no authority to make a company pick up and move out of the city,” Moore said.
“We only make recommendations based on land development and usage issues,” said Commissioner Annette Pyatt.
A motion, requested by Pyatt and made by Moore in her absence when she had to leave the meeting early, sought a permit application for increased capacity from Covanta, as well as the installation of additional pollution control devices. The motion died for lack of a second.
A motion to recommend not approving the application was successful, with many audience members shouting “aye” when it came time for the commissioners to vote.
Waffenschmidt was perplexed by the denial, saying that he thought the planning commission was supposed to examine the application’s conformity with existing land planning regulations.
“There was no factual explanation as to why it was denied,” he said. “We specifically asked for something that meets the code. We don’t know that the vote was based on its merits or whether it was swayed by the residents and their comments.”
Moore said the commission would prepare a resolution to be considered by city council, which would have the final say in approving or denying the application.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Vince Sullivan is a general assignment reporter for the Daily Times. Reach the author at vsullivan@delcotimes.com .